Workshop TR 1.4, Monday 19 June 16.00 - 17.30 |
Campaigns to increase cycle use |
David
Meikeljohn, Cambridge cycle-friendly Employers Graham Marshall, Perth, Western Australia Approaches to workplace cycling Perth, Australia and Cambridge, UK This presentation compares programmes to encourage cycling to work in Australia and the UK. Perth is a large low-density city with high car usage, while Cambridge is a relatively densely-populated city with good cycle usage rates by UK standards. The driving forces behind each programme are examined and also the influences that they have had in determining programme approaches. In the UK congestion, health and the environment are the main factors to promote change. In Perth, there is a growing reliance on cars for work trips. What can the two projects learn from each other? Funding restraints in the UK have promoted the use of 'soft' techniques, including publicity, training and setting up of a employers network. Ideas are shared and an annual cycle survey is made. Local and national planning policies and Cambridge's high demand for workers allows radical measures to be adopted. Perth's response has been similar, and they have learnt from previous efforts to reduce car trips. Their 'soft' marketing has led to a drop in single occupant vehicle trips. Their 'Cycling 100' project has focussed on easy to convert cyclists, and has attracted corporate sponsorship to provide bikes. This programme has increased cycle to work by 5%. |
Troels
Andersen, Civil Engineer, Parks and Roads Administration, City of Odense,Denmark.
|
Terry Ryan Report Workshop TR 1.4 |